Rsc_cp_c1cp22206f 1..20

نویسندگان

  • Vanessa Riffet
  • Gilles Frison
  • Guy Bouchoux
چکیده

Acid–base thermochemistry of isolated amino acids containing oxygen or sulfur in their side chain (serine, threonine, cysteine and methionine) have been examined by quantum chemical computations. Density functional theory (DFT) was used, with B3LYP, B97-D and M06-2X functionals using the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set for geometry optimizations and the larger 6-311++G(3df,2p) basis set for energy computations. Composite methods CBS-QB3, G3B3, G4MP2 and G4 were applied to large sets of neutral, protonated and deprotonated conformers. Conformational analysis of these species, based on chemical approach and AMOEBA force field calculations, has been used to identify the lowest energy conformers and to estimate the population of conformers expected to be present at thermal equilibrium at 298 K. It is observed that G4, G4MP2, G3B3, CBS-QB3 composite methods and M06-2X DFT lead to similar conformer energies. Thermochemical parameters have been computed using either the most stable conformers or equilibrium populations of conformers. Comparison of experimental and theoretical proton affinities and DacidH shows that the G4 method provides the better agreement with deviations of less than 1.5 kJ mol . From this point of view, a set of evaluated thermochemical quantities for serine, threonine, cysteine and methionine may be proposed: PA = 912, 919, 903, 938; GB = 878, 886, 870, 899; DacidH = 1393, 1391, 1396, 1411; DacidG = 1363, 1362, 1367, 1382 kJ mol . This study also confirms that a non-negligible DpS1 is associated with protonation of methionine and that the most acidic hydrogen of cysteine in the gas phase is that of the SH group. In several instances new conformers were identified thus suggesting a re-examination of several IRMPD spectra.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Equity in scaling up SimCalc: investigating differences in student learning and classroom implementation

Investigating Differences in Student Learning and Classroom Implementation ! "#$#%&!'()*+#,,#-!.'/!/01#$0213(02,-!4#$#%&5$()*+#,,#6)$35*(%! "#))3*2!73#$)(0-!.20!83#9(!.121#!:03;#$)31&-!4<3#$)(06%23,5)=)>5#=>! .>)20!?%<)(0-!:03;#$)31&!(@!A#B2)!21!C>)130-!#%<)(06%23,5>1#B2)5#=>! D3*(,#!.+#*+1%20-!.'/!/01#$0213(02,-!03*(,#5)+#*+1%206)$35*(%! E2$93#!8>00-!'>19#$)!:03;#$)31&-!D#F2$G-!=>006*)5$>19#$)...

متن کامل

Genetic and Protein Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Cancer Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Professional Institutional Original Effective Date: February 11, 2011 Original Effective Date: February 11, 2011 Revision Date(s): December 1, 2011; April 10, 2012; June 29, 2012; January 1, 2013; August 20, 2013; January 1, 2015; January 1, 2016; January 20, 2016 Revision Date(s): December 1, 2011; April 10, 2012; June 29, 2012; January 1, 2013; August 20, 2013; January 1, 2015; January 1, 201...

متن کامل

Suffolk County Golf Course Monitoring Sites and Test Results

B & C Golf Course, East Hampton S-115059 Accabonac Rd 7-Feb-2000 150 6 <0.02 <0.02 0.3 < 2 < 1 2.26 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 20 < 20 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 5 < 0.5 < 0.4 <0.2 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 <0.3 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.3 < 0.2 13-Nov-2001 142 10 <0.02 <0...

متن کامل

Fixpoint Computation: Leaking Gas Burner

Real-time distributed system speciication and veriication in asynchronous propositional temporal logic. Let A be the integrator system deened in Figure 5. We use the xpoint computation procedure to prove that the formula y 60 ! 20t y is an invariant of A. It follows that the gas burner leaks at most one twentieth of the time in any interval of at least 60 seconds. Let R i = hpc = 1 ^ t = 0 ^ x ...

متن کامل

Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1).

BACKGROUND Considerable, unexamined controversy exists surrounding the use of the highest vs the lowest FEV(1) for calculating the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) during direct bronchoprovocation challenges. OBJECTIVE To compare the PC(20) calculated using the lowest FEV(1) post-diluent and post-histamine/methacholine vs the PC(20) calculated using the highest ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011